What's new
  • Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

Cell phone carriers getting worse?

Desiato

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
519
Location
Ottawa
A merger between the new entrants would not have changed things. The pricing of the new carriers is low only to entice new customers. It is not sustainable while growing. Based on their existing business models, they are unable to find investors to build better networks.

Look at the public financial reports. Bell, Rogers and Telus have tens of billions of dollars of debt. They can borrow money to build networks because they have a sustainable business plans. They take big risks and earn a lot of profit for their shareholders.

I'm not saying I like the big 3, and I hate to defend them, but at the same time, I believe the media loves to target them because it's easy (ad) money. No one like paying bills, and there's enough anecdotal evidence to get consumers riled up.

IMO, if mobile users in Canada were really being as reamed as is often suggested, investors would be lining up to build up companies like Wind because it'd be easy money.
 

draemn

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 10, 2010
Messages
1,672
Location
Fort St. John, BC
Honestly, I think there is something kind of like price fixing going on... I feel like all of the big three have agreed not to stir up the pot too much with pricing and all have similar priced plans. But I also think a lot of people just assume cell towers in Canada are as cheap to build as in many places in Europe. It's just simply not. We might have most people living in cities, but our density is still lower and that increases cost of infrastructure. The problem with your idea of companies lining up to build another wind mobile is flawed though. Not only is it (regulatory) difficult to get approval to start a new wireless company, but it is also very very very expensive to build the initial infrastructure. Telus/Bell and Rogers have spent over a decade building up their towers and such. Any new company basically gets stuck on the "build some towers in the city, rent access from the big 3, twiddle thumbs as we spend tons of money building more and hoping we'll have the customer base to pay it off."
 

Eluder

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 27, 2008
Messages
612
Location
Toronto, Ontario
A merger between the new entrants would not have changed things. The pricing of the new carriers is low only to entice new customers. It is not sustainable while growing. Based on their existing business models, they are unable to find investors to build better networks.

Look at the public financial reports. Bell, Rogers and Telus have tens of billions of dollars of debt. They can borrow money to build networks because they have a sustainable business plans. They take big risks and earn a lot of profit for their shareholders.

I'm not saying I like the big 3, and I hate to defend them, but at the same time, I believe the media loves to target them because it's easy (ad) money. No one like paying bills, and there's enough anecdotal evidence to get consumers riled up.

IMO, if mobile users in Canada were really being as reamed as is often suggested, investors would be lining up to build up companies like Wind because it'd be easy money.

Bingo, this is really it. Right from the start, I knew the new entrants weren't here to stay. Their business model was seriously flawed and just won't work in a small market such as Canada. You can't grow your business and build a proper network with ARPU so low unless you can gather millions of customers into your base, it's just not sustainable. The big 3 have made big changes for the better when it comes to pricing, sure it's not as competitive as Wind/Mobilicity, but you are getting a better network, better service, LTE, etc, so you're going to pay a premium for it. Is it worth it? Well to me, it is, I would never switch to one of the new entrants since their networks just aren't there and clearly won't improve to the point of where they will fit my needs.
 

b1lk1

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
2,747
Location
Lindsay, Ontario
I'll take my lower data plans from Koodo ANYDAY over any of the big guys who lock you up into a contract. Only thing you have to do when you cancel Koodo is pay your tab. The big guys will also make you pay for your phone, and then they have a nice large cancellation fee too.
 

Sagath

Moderator
Staff member
Folding Team
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
6,644
Location
Edmonton, AB
I'll take my lower data plans from Koodo ANYDAY over any of the big guys who lock you up into a contract. Only thing you have to do when you cancel Koodo is pay your tab. The big guys will also make you pay for your phone, and then they have a nice large cancellation fee too.

Or, just buy your unlocked phone, and go where you will, when you will, with whomever you want. All without changing your number.

(That last point is probably the only good thing the CRTC put into place in its existence)
 

av3n

Well-known member
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
53
Or, just buy your unlocked phone, and go where you will, when you will, with whomever you want. All without changing your number.

(That last point is probably the only good thing the CRTC put into place in its existence)

That's one thing I'm grateful for, porting is quite painless. On the other hand it doesn't stop Rogers charging you $100 for a "cancellation fee" even though your contract already expired...
 

Eluder

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 27, 2008
Messages
612
Location
Toronto, Ontario
Never seen that, though you have to give 30 days notice when porting, other than that, you shouldn't be charged some $100 cancellation fee if you contract is expired.
 

draemn

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 10, 2010
Messages
1,672
Location
Fort St. John, BC
I love this, I was charged $5 x2 for phoning #2030 from my cell phone because when I tried to phone my credit card company I got a message saying I needed to phone that to get their new number to call them... Seriously this should be illegal to get charges like this without being told that you'll be charged for the service. This #2030 was some sort of directory service that gave me a number to phone. Weird thing is today I used the same number to call my credit card company no problem (to complain about this #2030 thing)
 

normandheine

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2013
Messages
1
I don't know about services rather than G3. I think they charges descent rates on long distance calling and roaming to all the countries. We can enjoy PIN-less dialing plus LOW international rates to call to anywhere. Recharge as needed or enroll in Auto Recharge (so you'll never run out of funds)
 

Latest posts

Top