A merger between the new entrants would not have changed things. The pricing of the new carriers is low only to entice new customers. It is not sustainable while growing. Based on their existing business models, they are unable to find investors to build better networks.
Look at the public financial reports. Bell, Rogers and Telus have tens of billions of dollars of debt. They can borrow money to build networks because they have a sustainable business plans. They take big risks and earn a lot of profit for their shareholders.
I'm not saying I like the big 3, and I hate to defend them, but at the same time, I believe the media loves to target them because it's easy (ad) money. No one like paying bills, and there's enough anecdotal evidence to get consumers riled up.
IMO, if mobile users in Canada were really being as reamed as is often suggested, investors would be lining up to build up companies like Wind because it'd be easy money.
Look at the public financial reports. Bell, Rogers and Telus have tens of billions of dollars of debt. They can borrow money to build networks because they have a sustainable business plans. They take big risks and earn a lot of profit for their shareholders.
I'm not saying I like the big 3, and I hate to defend them, but at the same time, I believe the media loves to target them because it's easy (ad) money. No one like paying bills, and there's enough anecdotal evidence to get consumers riled up.
IMO, if mobile users in Canada were really being as reamed as is often suggested, investors would be lining up to build up companies like Wind because it'd be easy money.