vultusprime
Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2018
- Messages
- 12
Hello everyone!
I have been looking to buy a new gaming pc for the past year or so. I waited because several new things came out very close to one another.
At first I was going to buy intel, the choice was between the i5 9600k and the i7 9700k (the 8700k seemed out of stock).
Then the new Ryzen were released (3600, 3600x, 3700x etc..) I was very exited, especially for the ryzen 5 3600. Here was a budget cpu with plenty of gaming power. It also could be paired with a relatively cheap motherboard (MSI b450 Tomahawk) unlike the Z390s for intel.
I understand that with any new technology there are always a few rough edges to be smoothed out, so I waited a little longer. But right now AMD still has a few problems. The core voltage is unusually high and the high temperatures on idle. There are several cases of people complaining about this. Every computer forum you go you'll find post after post of people complaining about their new Ryzen stupidly high temps, like 40 and 50 on idle. There is a post of someone experiencing 70 degrees on idle!
This is from another post on a Ryzen 5 3600 "the max temp is 92-93.6. avg is 80-85 when I'm gaming. At idle state, it's around 38-45. (Room temp 28-35)" These temps are shocking! Having a cpu sitting at 40 degrees while on idle is unacceptable.
When Ryzen 3000 first came out (especially the 3600) it was hailed as the CPU of choice, a great budget option with cooler included. Right now everyone is replacing the stock coolers. You-tubers that test and compare CPUs are putting on the Ryzen 5 3600 some of the most expensive air cooler on the market (Dark Rock Pro 4, Noctual) or even water-cooling.
Water-cooling on a Ryzen 5 3600! Is this what we've come to?
I am not a fan of either blue or red, I could care less about that. But I am a fan of what works, out of the box. Of that, I am a fan!
On that aspect Intel has the advantage. Regardless of performance and price, Intel will install and work as advertised, with normal core voltages and low temps on idle. AS it should be.
Will AMD ever sort out these problems? Nothing would make my happier that buying a new Ryzen 5 3600, it's performance/price ratio is incredible. I have already prepared a list of parts for an Intel or AMD build. If these problems were fixed I'd go out today and buy it. But not when these "glitches" are still lingering, with no solution in sight.
As of now, I am once again tending towards Intel but the choice is pretty limited with only the i7 9700K. Anything below that is now pointless.
But even the i7 feels "old" as it is without HT, Intel really hit below the belt with that one and I am not happy because I'd also be spending much more. I am prepared to wait a month or 2 but eventually I must replace my aging pc.
As of right now AMD seems like the risky choice, while Intel doesn't fell like the choice of the future.
I find myself with a dilemma. I can't buy what I want, and am forced to buy something I don't really want.
I have been looking to buy a new gaming pc for the past year or so. I waited because several new things came out very close to one another.
At first I was going to buy intel, the choice was between the i5 9600k and the i7 9700k (the 8700k seemed out of stock).
Then the new Ryzen were released (3600, 3600x, 3700x etc..) I was very exited, especially for the ryzen 5 3600. Here was a budget cpu with plenty of gaming power. It also could be paired with a relatively cheap motherboard (MSI b450 Tomahawk) unlike the Z390s for intel.
I understand that with any new technology there are always a few rough edges to be smoothed out, so I waited a little longer. But right now AMD still has a few problems. The core voltage is unusually high and the high temperatures on idle. There are several cases of people complaining about this. Every computer forum you go you'll find post after post of people complaining about their new Ryzen stupidly high temps, like 40 and 50 on idle. There is a post of someone experiencing 70 degrees on idle!
This is from another post on a Ryzen 5 3600 "the max temp is 92-93.6. avg is 80-85 when I'm gaming. At idle state, it's around 38-45. (Room temp 28-35)" These temps are shocking! Having a cpu sitting at 40 degrees while on idle is unacceptable.
When Ryzen 3000 first came out (especially the 3600) it was hailed as the CPU of choice, a great budget option with cooler included. Right now everyone is replacing the stock coolers. You-tubers that test and compare CPUs are putting on the Ryzen 5 3600 some of the most expensive air cooler on the market (Dark Rock Pro 4, Noctual) or even water-cooling.
Water-cooling on a Ryzen 5 3600! Is this what we've come to?
I am not a fan of either blue or red, I could care less about that. But I am a fan of what works, out of the box. Of that, I am a fan!
On that aspect Intel has the advantage. Regardless of performance and price, Intel will install and work as advertised, with normal core voltages and low temps on idle. AS it should be.
Will AMD ever sort out these problems? Nothing would make my happier that buying a new Ryzen 5 3600, it's performance/price ratio is incredible. I have already prepared a list of parts for an Intel or AMD build. If these problems were fixed I'd go out today and buy it. But not when these "glitches" are still lingering, with no solution in sight.
As of now, I am once again tending towards Intel but the choice is pretty limited with only the i7 9700K. Anything below that is now pointless.
But even the i7 feels "old" as it is without HT, Intel really hit below the belt with that one and I am not happy because I'd also be spending much more. I am prepared to wait a month or 2 but eventually I must replace my aging pc.
As of right now AMD seems like the risky choice, while Intel doesn't fell like the choice of the future.
I find myself with a dilemma. I can't buy what I want, and am forced to buy something I don't really want.