What's new
  • Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

AMD Radeon R9 290 4GB Review Comment Thread

EmptyMellon

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
522
To some $150 may be worth the extra 5-7 FPS, but the R9-290 is a grant FPS winner, by my wallet. Though much like the 290X, will like to see AIB versions of this card, to better address screaming banshee/easy-bake oven low points of the R9-290, and see how well the AIBs can turns those frowns upside down.
 

IRQ Conflict

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
1,804
Location
Drayton Valley, AB
Excellent Review as always.

I was a little surprised at the min FPS in Tomb Raider. But WOW! I want two of these!

I think AMD may have slit it's wrists though with regards to the X. Mind you it may differentiate itself more with third party cooling. I don't think (as it stands) $150.00 is worth the ~7% more performance. But that's just me.

Edit: Still not finding the 290X any cheaper than 610.00 though. Not sure if availability is there yet. It wasn't last I checked. :sad:
 
Last edited:

le2key

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 21, 2010
Messages
115
Location
BC
Excellent Review as always.

I was a little surprised at the min FPS in Tomb Raider. But WOW! I want two of these!

I think AMD may have slit it's wrists though with regards to the X. Mind you it may differentiate itself more with third party cooling. I don't think (as it stands) $150.00 is worth the ~7% more performance. But that's just me.

Edit: Still not finding the 290X any cheaper than 610.00 though. Not sure if availability is there yet. It wasn't last I checked. :sad:
agree. i think the 290 is gonna cannibalize AMD's high end GPU segment. $400 for that kind of performance is just wicked.
 

Desiato

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
520
Location
Ottawa
agree. i think the 290 is gonna cannibalize AMD's high end GPU segment. $400 for that kind of performance is just wicked.
IMO, $500+ cards are extremely low volume to begin with. I base this opinion on Steam survey results. My guess these cards are priced according to volume.

I think that in forums like these, we get the impression that top end cards are more relevant than they actually are - in terms of sales and market penetration.
 

Dzzope

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
3,299
Location
Irishman in Kiev, wOOoo, I'm an alien...
I don't like the whole Nvidia finally giving in to pressure type stuff on the pricing.. it's not like they take 3-5 months to get their prices to a point people are willing to pay vs AMD.. Unlike AMD who after the 6xx series was released were idiotic in their reaction time. Really Nvidia took a week to respond to the 290x (which had basically no supply anyway) and time will tell if they need to and indeed if they will respond further by dropping the 780's price.

On the 290. IF this was released the same time as the 780.. then they probably would have had my money though at the same time I don't think Nvidia will sit on their hands re the price (and do your charts on price to performance on the last page include the games value?)

As with the 290x.. big downs are this is an architecture being pushed to it's limits and it shows with the heat, noise and power consumption.. all 3 are things I wanted to avoid with my current build...
Bit of buyers remorse at spending as much as I did and 2 months later I could have had more performance for just over half the spend.. but hey, thats the game. :)
 

Latest posts

Twitter

Top