It was expressed to me that publishing this article "could damage the relationship" between HardOCP and NVIDIA.
It would seem that Kyle Bennett (HardOCP) has possibly ruffled a few feathers at Nvidia. :haha:
It was expressed to me that publishing this article "could damage the relationship" between HardOCP and NVIDIA.
Intentionally optimizing/giving benefits for a particular subset of hardware is dumb. Could you imagine if RAM companies started pulling this shit, and what the outcry would be? Or specific SSD manufacturers?
Another article on the subject:
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia’s-new-geforce-partner-program-under-criticism.html
Funny quote from the end of this one: "And also let me throw in one more thing that has been playing in my head while writing this. As a bit of a paradox and food for thoughts; what about the AMD exclusivity with XFX & Sapphire? "
I strongly suspect the "exclusivity" of those particular manufacturers is a choice they've made themselves as opposed to something that's been forced on them by AMD. It could also be argued that Sapphire has always been "the" official manufacturer of ATI/AMD products in everything but name.
I don't see the issue. NVidia is telling manufacturers that if they exclusively make NVidia products they will gain access to a list of benefits that they would not get if they make AMD and Intel graphics cards. No one is being forced to partner. And they are not excluding companies, so if ASUS continues to make AMD and NVidia cards then ASUS will not gain the extras. They probably don't need the extras, but there they are if they want them.
xentr_legal_notice_description