Marzipan
Well-known member
I'm curious because transferring some 2 - 4 GB files to a couple different flash drives using a USB 3.2 Gen 1 USB A (5Gb/s aka 500MB/s) and a USB 2.0 USB A (480Mb/s, aka 40 - 60MB/s, but since half-duplex, 20 - 30MB/s) port on my Dell G15 5515 gave significantly different results.
128GB Kingston Exodia (non-M) , USB A
1TB Kingston MAX, USB A
SSD-Tester's benchmarking show the Exodia top write speed is 26MB/s while the MAX is about 1GB/s.
Exodia on the USB 3.2 G1 transferred between 11 - 14MB/s while on the USB 2.0 port, transferred between 6 - 8MB/s.
MAX was getting 600MB/s on the USB 3.2 G1 port and 40MB/s on the USB 2.0 port.
What's causing the Exodia drive to have such terrible performance while the MAX got exactly what was expected? I'm curious...
128GB Kingston Exodia (non-M) , USB A
1TB Kingston MAX, USB A
SSD-Tester's benchmarking show the Exodia top write speed is 26MB/s while the MAX is about 1GB/s.
Exodia on the USB 3.2 G1 transferred between 11 - 14MB/s while on the USB 2.0 port, transferred between 6 - 8MB/s.
MAX was getting 600MB/s on the USB 3.2 G1 port and 40MB/s on the USB 2.0 port.
What's causing the Exodia drive to have such terrible performance while the MAX got exactly what was expected? I'm curious...