If you are using the advmethods flag it sure does help.:doh:
Are you telling me I need to sell these and get 1 giggers now? :blarg:
This makes me feel like :doh:.
~100mhz more core than my 470 but 112 less cores and you're netting the same PPD more or less.
wait,hold on a little minute here. 970 core on a 460? good god thats good! you sure its not 870?
Quoted for truth! My 2X GTX 460 768mb are doing 3500 ppd more each with advmethods, but it slow down my 980x and lost 10 000 ppdNice!
Imageshack - foldingm.png
Now if Stanford could only fix their -bigadv units, I could get that SMP client up to speed.
Also please note that the gpu flag -advmethods is eating up ALOT of extra CPU time. That SMP went from 7 min TPF's to 9:30 after I implemented them on both GPUS
Havnt got to test it with -bigadv, but for the extra 2500 ppd on both clients, I think it might not be worth it to run -advmethods on the GPU's because of the probable loss of PPD off the SMP client.