What's new Search

Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lysrin, post: 882203, member: 24761"]I think it's good news too, simply for the fact that G-Sync monitors were and continue to be crazy expensive. Having access to more reasonably priced 27" and larger monitors with adaptive sync that works regardless of GPU platform is awesome!Not sure if G-Sync will eventually get better lower pricing, or will simply fade away. It is superior to Freesync in some ways, I read, but I'm guessing not superior enough to warrant the price difference once an alternative adaptive sync option works on NVIDIA GPUs; particularly on high quality adaptive sync monitors that implement VESA adaptive sync correctly.The "G-Sync Compatible" branding is a bit confusing for the consumer. Not sure if NVIDIA is trying to muddy the waters there to keep the G-Sync name in people's heads or what. It's confusing to test and certify an adaptive sync monitor as "G-Sync Compatible" when in fact it isn't running G-Sync at all but rather an alternative adaptive sync tech. Nice to know the monitor meets some standard maybe, but confusing terminology. It should have been named "NVIDIA Adaptive Sync Certification" or something.[/QUOTE]

About Us

Hardware Canucks is focused in-depth reviews of the the latest graphics cards, CPUs, storage, smartphones, notebooks and gaming peripherals. Join us as we unbox, review and benchmark the best computer hardware on the market.
Forum statistics

Threads

66,843

Messages

835,379

Members

24,958

Latest member

Jtv22
Follow Us On Social Media

Facebook Twitter youtube Instagram
Contact
- Contact Us
- https://hardwarecanucks.com/