Firefox Performance / Real World Data Transfers
<i>Firefox is notorious for being slow on loading tabs in offline mode once the number of pages to be opened grows larger than a dozen or so. We can think of fewer worse case scenarios than having 100 tabs set to reload in offline mode upon Firefox startup, but this is exactly what we have done here.
By having 100 pages open in Firefox portable, setting Firefox to reload the last session upon next session start and then setting it to offline mode, we are able to easily recreate a worse case scenario. Since we are using Firefox portable all files are easily positioned in one location, making it simple to repeat the test as necessary. In order to ensure repetition, before touching the Firefox portable files, we have backed them up into a .rar file and only extracted a copy of it to the test device.</i>
<div align="center">
<img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/Revo350/ff.jpg" border="0" alt="" />
</div>
<i>No matter how good a synthetic benchmark like IOMeter or PCMark is, it can not really tell you how your hard drive will perform in “real world” situations. All of us here at Hardware Canucks strive to give you the best, most complete picture of a review item’s true capabilities and to this end we will be running timed data transfers to give you a general idea of how its performance relates to real life use. To help replicate worse case scenarios we will transfer a 10.00GB contiguous file and a folder containing 400 subfolders with a total 12,000 files varying in length from 200mb to 100kb (10.00 GB total).
Testing will include transfer to and transferring from the devices, using MS RichCopy and logging the performance of the drive. Here is what we found. </i>
<div align="center">
<img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/Revo350/copy_lg.jpg" border="0" alt="" />
<img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/Revo350/copy_sm.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>
Once again we have absolutely nothing bad to say about these results. In fact, they do need a bit of explanation. You see, our fastest storage device to date has been the Intel 910 800GB and that is what is used to test real world data transfers…and in one fell swoop the OCZ RevoDrive 350 has saturated its write performance. So much so that for the first time ever an Intel 910 800GB is the bottleneck in this test!
Considering you can get </i>four and a half</i> RevoDrive 350 480GBs for the same amount as <i>one</i> Intel 910 800GB, words actually fail us.
Firefox Portable Offline Performance
<i>Firefox is notorious for being slow on loading tabs in offline mode once the number of pages to be opened grows larger than a dozen or so. We can think of fewer worse case scenarios than having 100 tabs set to reload in offline mode upon Firefox startup, but this is exactly what we have done here.
By having 100 pages open in Firefox portable, setting Firefox to reload the last session upon next session start and then setting it to offline mode, we are able to easily recreate a worse case scenario. Since we are using Firefox portable all files are easily positioned in one location, making it simple to repeat the test as necessary. In order to ensure repetition, before touching the Firefox portable files, we have backed them up into a .rar file and only extracted a copy of it to the test device.</i>
<div align="center">
<img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/Revo350/ff.jpg" border="0" alt="" />
</div>
Real World Data Transfers
<i>No matter how good a synthetic benchmark like IOMeter or PCMark is, it can not really tell you how your hard drive will perform in “real world” situations. All of us here at Hardware Canucks strive to give you the best, most complete picture of a review item’s true capabilities and to this end we will be running timed data transfers to give you a general idea of how its performance relates to real life use. To help replicate worse case scenarios we will transfer a 10.00GB contiguous file and a folder containing 400 subfolders with a total 12,000 files varying in length from 200mb to 100kb (10.00 GB total).
Testing will include transfer to and transferring from the devices, using MS RichCopy and logging the performance of the drive. Here is what we found. </i>
<div align="center">
<img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/Revo350/copy_lg.jpg" border="0" alt="" />
<img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/Revo350/copy_sm.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>
Once again we have absolutely nothing bad to say about these results. In fact, they do need a bit of explanation. You see, our fastest storage device to date has been the Intel 910 800GB and that is what is used to test real world data transfers…and in one fell swoop the OCZ RevoDrive 350 has saturated its write performance. So much so that for the first time ever an Intel 910 800GB is the bottleneck in this test!
Considering you can get </i>four and a half</i> RevoDrive 350 480GBs for the same amount as <i>one</i> Intel 910 800GB, words actually fail us.
Last edited by a moderator: