What's new
  • Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

Seagate Enterprise Capacity v5 8TB Review

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
With SSDs evolving at a breakneck speed, there are times when the rapid changes to traditional spindle-based storage are simply overlooked. And yet in the last year or so there have been several massive steps forward for HDD technology which has allowed drives to better compete against the rising SSD tide, at least from a price for capacity standpoint. For example, Western Digital has moved towards a helium-filled chassis to boost capacity and performance on their latest RED series.

However, a lot of the Western Digital RED’s performance stems from the fact that it is an exotic gas based model, which relies upon seven platters and fourteen read/write heads. While many, many consumers will find it to be a very good fit some many worry about what happens when the helium is slowly replaced by fresh air via a method called outgassing.

Considering the enterprise market is very sensitive about such things, another more conservative and traditional design may hold a lot of appeal. The recently released Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 8TB is one such model that fits this perceived need to a veritable ‘T’.

intro.jpg

Unlike Western Digital, Seagate has deftly avoided the exotic route for the latest refresh of their EC series. There isn’t any helium used and there aren’t seven platters crammed into a chassis that was designed to house a mere six platters.

This particular model does not even use Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) technology which overlaps the platter’s sectors like shingles on a roof in order to increase density. Instead Seagate utilizes the tried, tested and true Perpendicular Magnetic Recording (PMR) technology. Put another way the new Seagate Enterprise Capacity v5 series is a classic 7,200RPM hard drive with very few unknowns to worry about and that will make it very appealing for enterprise-class customers who don’t want to be beta testers for new and potentially unproven technologies.

top1_sm.jpg

Without exotic ‘silver bullets’ to rely upon to reach its capacity threshold, Seagate had to do things the old fashioned way and simply increased the aerial density of the platters. As such the 8YB version uses six platters (and twelve heads) just like the previous EC 3.5 v4 model, but the aerial density has been boosted from 1TB per platter to a whopping 1.34TB per platter. This makes the Seagate EC 3.5 v5 one of the most advanced ‘classic’ hard drives available today.

But make no mistake about it; even though this drive does have one less platter, and two fewer read/write heads than some of its Western Digital competition it is still considered a high performance model solution. The Enterprise Capacity V5 lineup is meant for the most demanding of scenarios that would make a standard Western Digital RED curl up into a ball and bite its pillow. Unfortunately, the traditional approach also leads to it consuming more electricity, producing more heat, and generally being louder than any other 8TB 5,400RPM model.

But will the potential downfalls matter to business-minded buyers who will likely install these drives in offsite clusters? Many of them will be more than happy to trade a bit of noise, power and heat for proven technology, a long warranty, huge MTBF numbers and the performance allowed by a 7200RPM rotational speed.

board_sm.jpg

To be blunt we have very little doubts on the performance side of this equation since a velocity of 7,200 RPMs combined with an aerial density of 1.34TB per planner should lead to some massive numbers. However, what remains to be seen is how much additional performance this new V5 has compared to its predecessor the V4, which is still a mighty powerful hard drive.

Helping to alleviate such concerns Seagate has included a few additional tweaks to the base design. For example, not only has Seagate doubled the onboard RAM cache capacity from 128MB to 256MB (via a single Winbond DDR3-1600 SDRAM IC) they have also drastically improved their caching algorithms. This improvement alone promises to noticeably improve the random write abilities compared to the previous series. The onboard controller has also been upgraded.

bot_sm.jpg

While Seagate has certainly made improvements they have also wisely carried over everything that made the v4 such a great choice for Enterprise customers. As with later versions of the V4, the new V5 has an impressive Mean Time Between Failure of 2 million hours, and a massive 550TB of writes per year for five years.

Also like the v4, the v5 includes Super Parity ECC, which adds an additional parity bit on top of the normal ECC parity. The additional 'super' parity allows this drive to boast an uncorrectable error rate of 1 per 10 to the 15th power - or 1 uncorrectable bit per 125TB of writes. This in combination with the RAID controller's ECC means that with the exception of a catastrophic failure, write errors should be ultra-rare.

bot2_sm.jpg

Also like its predecessor the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 uses a state of the art chassis that allows for much more internal room than in the typical 3.5” model. Basically the metal chassis is not only thinner but also flatter allowing 6 platters alongside an additional inertia actuator, a sealed top plate mounted spindle motor and even a turbulence reducing top disk separator plate which will keep the heads from 'cow belling' or slamming into the platters.

These are all features that are sure to appeal to the business market, but one feature that really stands out is the overall power consumption this new series boasts. On the surface a seemingly minor reduction from 10.6 watts of nominal power usage to 10.4 watts does not sound all that extraordinary, but it is actually quite impressive. Put simply this high performance, high queue depth hard drive has a watts per Terabyte ratting which is better than some older, smaller 5,400RPM models!

A mere 1.3 watts of typical power consumption per Terabyte of capacity is truly spectacular and it is this unique combination of performance, reliability, capacity and even efficiency that Seagate are counting on to help the v5 8TB justify its moderately high asking price of $362.
 
Last edited:

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
Test System and Testing Methodology

Testing Methodology


Testing a drive is not as simple as putting together a bunch of files, dragging them onto folder on the drive in Windows and using a stopwatch to time how long the transfer takes. Rather, there are factors such as read / write speed and data burst speed to take into account. There is also the SATA controller on your motherboard and how well it works with SSDs & HDDs to think about as well. For best results you really need a dedicated hardware RAID controller w/ dedicated RAM for drives to shine. Unfortunately, most people do not have the time, inclination or monetary funds to do this. For this reason our testbed will be a more standard motherboard with no mods or high end gear added to it. This is to help replicate what you the end user’s experience will be like.

Even when the hardware issues are taken care of the software itself will have a negative or positive impact on the results. As with the hardware end of things, to obtain the absolute best results you do need to tweak your OS setup; however, just like with the hardware solution most people are not going to do this. For this reason our standard OS setup is used. However, except for the Vista load test times we have done our best to eliminate this issue by having the drive tested as a secondary drive. With the main drive being a Intel DC S3700 800GB Solid State Drive.

For synthetic tests we used a combination of the ATTO Disk Benchmark, HDTach, HD Tune, Crystal Disk Benchmark, IOMeter, AS-SSD and PCMark 7.

For real world benchmarks such as OS startup, Firefox reload and data transfer times. For data transfer we timed how long a single 10GB rar file took to copy to and then from the devices. We also used 10gb of small files (from 100kb to 200MB) with a total 12,000 files in 400 subfolders.

All tests were run 4 times and average results are represented.

In between each test suite runs (with the exception being IOMeter which was done after every run) the drives are cleaned with either HDDerase, SaniErase or OCZ SSDToolbox and then quick formatted to make sure that they were in optimum condition for the next test suite.

For all RAID testing an LSI MegaRaid 9240 was used; however all drives attached were configured as JBOD and MS Windows 7 built in drive management tools were used to create the RAID array.

Processor: Core i7 5930K
Motherboard: Asus Sabretooth TUF X99
Memory: 32GB Crucial Ballistix Elite DDR4-2666
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Hard Drive: Intel DC S3700 800GB, Intel P3700 800GB
Power Supply: XFX 850
SAS Controller: LSI MegaRaid 9240
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
Read Bandwidth / Write Performance

Read Bandwidth


For this benchmark, HD Tune Pro was used. It shows the potential read speed which you are likely to experience with these storage devices. We don’t put much stock in Burst speed readings and thus we no longer included it. The most important number is the Average Speed number. This number will tell you what to expect from a given drive in normal, day to day operations. The higher the average the faster your entire system will seem.

read.jpg


Write Performance


For this benchmark HD Tune Pro was used. To run the write benchmark on a drive, you must first remove all partitions from that drive and then and only then will it allow you to run this test. Unlike some other benchmarking utilities, the HD Tune Pro writes across the full area of the drive, thus it easily shows any weakness a drive may have.

write.jpg

No matter if single drive or RAID performance is what matters most to you, this drive is going to impress – as it is bloody fast. Also, it not only starts out fast – at about 245MB/s – but stays fast. To be precise in single drive configuration consumers can expect to get at least 200MB/s for about 3.8 Terabytes worth of the capacity, and 150MB/s or better for nearly 6.5 of the 8.0 Terabytes of storage. Best of all, even at the very end you will still get better than 110MB/s from this drive. Now that is fast, and the fact it does it without exotic technology just makes it all the more impressive.
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
ATTO Disk Benchmark

ATTO Disk Benchmark


The ATTO disk benchmark tests the drives read and write speeds using gradually larger size files. For these tests, the ATTO program was set to run from its smallest to largest value (.5KB to 8192KB) and the total length was set to 256MB. The test program then spits out an extrapolated performance figure in megabytes per second.

atto_w.jpg

atto_r.jpg

Thanks to the insanely dense platters, and better firmware, the new Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 8TB series does not need fourteen read/write heads or exotic technology to boost performance into the stratosphere – it’s does that nicely without them. It also convincingly beats the outgoing V4 series.
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
Crystal DiskMark / PCMark 7 / AS-SSD

Crystal DiskMark


Crystal DiskMark is designed to quickly test the performance of your hard drives. Currently, the program allows to measure sequential and random read/write speeds; and allows you to set the number of tests iterations to run. We left the number of tests at 5 and size at 100MB.

cdm_r.jpg

cdm_w.jpg


PCMark 7


While there are numerous suites of tests that make up PCMark 7, only one is pertinent: the HDD Suite. The HDD Suite consists of numerous tests that try and replicate real world drive usage. Everything from how long a simulated virus scan takes to complete, to MS Vista start up time to game load time is tested in these core tests; however, we do not consider this anything other than just another suite of synthetic tests. For this reason, while each test is scored individually we have opted to include only the overall score.

pcm.jpg


AS-SSD


AS-SSD is designed to quickly test the performance of your drives. Currently, the program allows to measure sequential and small 4K read/write speeds as well as 4K file speed at a queue depth of 6. While its primary goal is to accurately test Solid State Drives, it does equally well on all storage mediums it just takes longer to run each test as each test reads or writes 1GB of data.

asd_w.jpg

asd_r.jpg


Once again this conservatively designed hard drive gives up very little in the performance department. To be blunt it is extremely fast, so fast that even Velociraptors cannot keep up. Brilliant stuff.
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
IOMeter Results

IOMETER: Our Standard Test


IOMeter is heavily weighted towards the server end of things, and since we here at HWC are more End User centric we will be setting and judging the results of IOMeter a little bit differently than most. To test each drive we ran 5 test runs per device (1,4,16,64,128 queue depth) each test having 8 parts, each part lasting 10 min w/ an additional 20 second ramp up. The 8 subparts were set to run 100% random, 80% read 20% write; testing 512b, 1k, 2k,4k,8k,16k,32k,64k size chunks of data. When each test is finished IOMeter spits out a report, in that reports each of the 8 subtests are given a score in I/Os per second. We then take these 8 numbers add them together and divide by 8. This gives us an average score for that particular queue depth that is heavily weighted for single user environments and workstation environments.

iom.jpg


IOMETER: File Server Test


To test each drive we ran 6 test runs per device (1,4,16,64,128,256 queue depth) each test having 8 parts, each part lasting 10 min w/ an additional 20 second ramp up. The 6 subparts were set to run 100% random, 75% read 25% write; testing 512b, 4k,8k,16k,32k,64k size chunks of data. When each test is finished IOMeter spits out a report, in that reports each of the 6 subtests are given a score in I/Os per second. We then take these 8 numbers add them together and divide by 6. This gives us an average score for that particular queue depth that is heavily weighted for file server usage.

iom_f.jpg


IOMETER: Web Server Test


The goal of our IOMeter Web Server configuration is to help reproduce a typical heavily accessed web server. The majority of the typical web server’s workload consists of dealing with random small file size read requests.

To replicate such an environment, we ran 6 test runs per device (1,4,16,64,128,256 queue depth) each test having 8 parts, each part lasting 10 min w/ an additional 20 second ramp up. The 8 subparts were set to run 100% random, 95% read 5% write; testing 512b, 1k, 2k,4k,8k,16k,32k,64k size chunks of data. When each test is finished IOMeter spits out a report, in that reports each of the 8 subtests are given a score in I/Os per second. We then take these 8 numbers add them together and divide by 8. This gives us an average score for that particular queue depth that is heavily weighted for web server environments.


iom_w.jpg


IOMETER: Email Server Test


The goal of our IOMeter Email Server configuration is to help reproduce a typical corporate email server. Unlike most servers, the typical email server’s workload is split evenly between random small file size read and write requests.

To replicate such an environment, we ran 5 test runs per drive (1,4,16,64,128 queue depth) each test having 3 parts, each part lasting 10 min w/ an additional 20 second ramp up. The 3 subparts were set to run 100% random, 50% read 50% write; testing 2k,4k,8k, size chunks of data. When each test is finished IOMeter spits out a report, in that reports each of the subtests are given a score in I/Os per second. We then take these numbers add them together and divide by 3. This gives us an average score for that particular queue depth that is heavily weighted for email server environments.


iom_e.jpg


For deep queue depth performance scenarios that also require the array to offer downright massive capacity the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 is nearly perfect. Of course, it should be as this is the main design goal of the v5 and does it ever deliver on its promise.
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
Windows Boot Times / Adobe CS5

Windows 7 Start Up w/ Boot Time A/V Scan Performance


When it comes to hard drive performance there is one area that even the most oblivious user notices: how long it takes to load the Operating System. Where Windows 7 has become nearly ubiquitous for solid state drive enthusiasts we have chosen Windows 7 64bit Ultimate as our Operating System. In previous load time tests we would use the Anti-Virus splash screen as our finish line; this however is no longer the case. We have not only added in a secondary Anti-Virus to load on startup, but also an anti-malware program. We have set Super Anti-Spyware to initiate a quick scan on Windows start-up and the completion of the quick scan will be our new finish line.

boot.jpg



Adobe CS5 Load Times


Photoshop is a notoriously slow loading program under the best of circumstances, and while the latest version is actually pretty decent, when you add in a bunch of extra brushes and the such you get a really great torture test which can bring even the best of the best to their knees. Let’s see how our review unit faired in the Adobe crucible.

adobe.jpg


While we highly doubt (m)any consumers will ever use one of these drives as their operating system and application ‘drive’, and while we doubt even fewer will use two or more of these, the results do speak for themselves. The V5 8TB is very quick for a series that has been optimized for deep queue depth performance.
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
Firefox / Real World Data Transfers

Firefox Portable Offline Performance


Firefox is notorious for being slow on loading tabs in offline mode once the number of pages to be opened grows larger than a dozen or so. We can think of fewer worse case scenarios than having 100 tabs set to reload in offline mode upon Firefox startup, but this is exactly what we have done here.

By having 100 pages open in Firefox portable, setting Firefox to reload the last session upon next session start and then setting it to offline mode, we are able to easily recreate a worse case scenario. Since we are using Firefox portable all files are easily positioned in one location, making it simple to repeat the test as necessary. In order to ensure repetition, before touching the Firefox portable files, we have backed them up into a .rar file and only extracted a copy of it to the test device.



ff.jpg



Real World Data Transfers


No matter how good a synthetic benchmark like IOMeter or PCMark is, it cannot really tell you how your hard drive will perform in “real world” situations. All of us here at Hardware Canucks strive to give you the best, most complete picture of a review item’s true capabilities and to this end we will be running timed data transfers to give you a general idea of how its performance relates to real life use. To help replicate worse case scenarios we will transfer a 10.00GB contiguous file and a folder containing 400 subfolders with a total 12,000 files varying in length from 200mb to 100kb (10.00 GB total).

Testing will include transfer to and transferring from the devices, using MS RichCopy and logging the performance of the drive. Here is what we found.


copy_lg.jpg

copy_sm.jpg


As the results show, this new series is highly capable in both deep queue depth and low queue depths scenarios. This does make the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 series extremely flexible. By the same token, at lower queue depths this series really is overkill and the increased noise, heat, and price will make it harder to justify compared to slower options like the Western Digital RED 8TB.
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
Partial and Full Drive Performance

Partial and Full Drive Performance


While it is important to know how a drive will perform under optimal conditions, more realistic scenarios are just as important. Knowing how drive will behave when partially or even nearly full than when it is empty is very important information to know. To quickly and accurately show this crucial information we have first filled the drive to 50% capacity and re-tested using both synthetic and real world tests. After the completion of this we then re-test at 75% and 90% of full capacity.

Synthetic Test Results

For our synthetic testing we have opted for our standard PCMark 7 test.

data_pcm.jpg


Real World Results

For a real world application we have opted for our standard Adobe CS5 test.

data_adobe.jpg

Good this drive amazingly consistent across its entire capacity. In fact, the only thing more predictable than the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 8TB is how long it will take to fill it to the 75% mark – let alone 90% point.

For most purchasers looking to replace older hard drives, the full impact of what this drive has to offer is best highlighted when comparing the 25% and 50% performance levels of the Seagate EC v5 to older 4TB’s 90% numbers. Doing this will give a much more accurate impression of how much additional performance will be gained by opting for these monster drives as this would be a more apples to apples comparison. The fact it can do all that and not rely upon Helium or SMR is just amazing.
 

SKYMTL

HardwareCanuck Review Editor
Staff member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
12,840
Location
Montreal
Conclusion; This is the HDD You've Been Looking For

Conclusion


Throughout testing the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 8TB continually impressed us with what it could accomplish. Regardless of whether it was in professionally-oriented scenarios or situations more akin to what one would find in HDDs geared towards the mass market, there’s so much to like about this new series. So much so that for consumers who want it all, and are willing to pay the premium for it, the V5 is a veritable no-brainer. Massive capacity? Check. Massive performance? Check. Five-year warranty? Check. Proven technology? Check. Put simply Seagate’s latest 8TB model is a marvel of engineering that exemplifies why as a company they have not only survived but thrived in a market where IBM and countless others could not. If you are looking for the best 3.5” hard drive for anything from enterprise storage arrays to a simple NAS, the EC 3.5 V5 demands attention.

Now before everyone cancels their latest pallet load of drives and substitutes in this series a few issues do need to be discussed. No one model can be right for all consumers or all scenarios since every hard drive makes compromises to accentuate some areas over the others. As stated previously this model has performance and capacity down pat. It also knocks it out of the park on the durability front since it is not just built to exacting standards but over-built in many cases. Mix in a five-year warranty with no concerns over the use of exotic technologies, and if these are areas you consider to be the most important then the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 8TB will be a great fit.

When it comes to price and value the outlook for the v5 8TB will really depend on what type usage scenario it is being utilized in. Remember, home users and enterprise clients tend to look at things quite differently. Most people will never need the massive amount of longevity built into these higher end storage solutions since their PC or NAS units simply don’t put a massive amount of continual stress upon their attached storage systems. As such, something like this new Seagate series may be complete overkill. It also demands a pretty significant premium when compared against drives that precisely target home use scenarios.

Enterprise consumers on the other hand also have to consider total cost of ownership with total electricity consumption and heat output playing a large role in their purchasing decision. They will understand that this model allows them to use fewer drives in a RAID array to not only meet capacity but IOPS needs as well. It is here where the Enterprise Capacity v5 absolutely shines; it achieves a high capacity, relatively low power consumption and great performance while allowing extremely dense RAID arrays on the enterprise front. Naturally, even within lower demand servers and scenarios where the queue depths are not deep, or where sheer performance is not the end all and be all, the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 v5 series is in fact overkill.

These factors make the v5 8TB a great value for its intended market and one of the best drives currently available if price isn’t an overriding factor when making a purchasing decision. Even outside the enterprise space, there’s no denying Seagate’s combination of simplicity, performance and capacity will make the new Enterprise Capacity drives will be understandably popular.

dam_good.jpg
di.png
 

Latest posts

Top