Sata III = 600MB/s (6Gb/s)I'm not really sure I understand the benefit of this unless SATA is bottlenecking the HDDs,
First Gen Dual Actuator drives are capable of sustained ~520MB/s
so yes SATA is very close to being the bottle neck.
"Performance Characteristics: SAS 12Gb/s vs. SATA 6Gb/s. The first-generation MACH.2 product will come very close to saturating the SATA 6Gb/s interface (600MB/s throughput). As stated above, the drive will have a 520MB/s sustained data rate (SDR) and next-generation drives will perform even better. Hence, the design decision was made to enable ecosystem and storage architectures to readily deploy next-generation MACH.2 drives without changing interface protocols."
This is all server based stuff for now it will be years before we see this trickle down either way. Basically these new drives are already SAS only because SATA isn't close to being enough for them. A quad-actuator drive would almost saturate a SAS connection