What's new
  • Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

Single core AMD --> C2D

sswilson

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Messages
17,899
Location
Moncton NB
I'm picking up an E6420 + one of those S775 Frankenstein Asrock boards (DDR1,DDR2,AGP,PCIe) tomorrow and will be doing a few comparison benchmarks between it and my current rig.

I'm going to be using my DDR1 on the Asrock & the PCIe bus on the asrock is limited to 4X so I'm mostly interested in seeing if it is really worth it to go with the asrock board as a slower upgrade path or if I would have been better served to wait a couple of months to get the scratch for a better board + DDR2.

Any specific types of benchmarks folks would be interested in before I rip my rig apart to build the C2D? (Within reason of course.... I wanna play with the new gear sometime this week, so I won't be entertaining any 2 day prime95 fests..... :) ).
 

Shadowed

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
236
Location
British Columbia
Are you going to use the 1950pro on that board ?
It will be interesting to see if there is much noticable difference running it on a 4x pcie bus.

Oh, btw, Happy birthday :)
 

sswilson

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Messages
17,899
Location
Moncton NB
Yep, for now I'll be using everything but the 3700 and the DFI board. (My young lad will just have to live with a couple of 512 sticks of ddr400 kingston value ram :shok: until I get the money for DDR2 800).

The X4 bus speed caught me by surprise as everybody has it listed as a PCIe 16X motherboard. I'm guessing that it's technically a X16 slot, but it shares the same X4 bus as the AGP slot.

So far, everything I've read leads me to believe that the GPU performance drop will be around 10%, but I'm keeping my fingers crossed that the boost from the dual core CPU will make up the difference in gaming.

I'm going to do the standards (AM2, 3DMark `03/`05/`06) for GPU, and probably try to come up with a file conversion (MP3 --> WMA) test and super-pi for synthetic/real cpu benchmarks.

Does anybody know of a freeware FPS benchmark based on a single game that I could download? (Like the fear or similar tests you see on most reviews).
 

Scratch

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
362
Location
Victoria BC Canada
yes Fraps are for games without an integrated bench demo. You can simply run Fraps in the background in the corner of your screen and use a specified area within a game as your benchmark then calculate your "mean" fps so you have a realtime gaming bench
It is also a good program for recording ingame events such as castle seiges and/or pvp events, Epic Boss Raids etc
 

sswilson

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Messages
17,899
Location
Moncton NB
Yeah, I'm looking more for something that has a built in benchmark, but I'm not a FPS gamer at all, so the only thing I've got which would even come close would be Oblivion and it doesn't have a benchmarking function. (well not that I know of anywise.....).

I'll just stick with the 3Dmark series then and not worry about the "synthetic test" issues.
 

sswilson

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Messages
17,899
Location
Moncton NB
I'm going to check through my Maximum PC disks to see if any of the demos have a benchmark function.
 

Twitter

Top