xentr_theme_editor

  • Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Max

xentr_thread_starter
Yeah, that seems a bit much. I know I got a great deal, but that's what I paid for my NIB POE enterprise.
 
what stuff actually needs PoE+++ levels of power? I can see gear that needs to be outside and heated to withstand crazy sub-zero temps...but what else?

also, they need to figure out a new way to say PoE+++...like, when it becomes PoE++++, call it PoE4? :p
It doesn't have PoE+++ out, only used for an input. So it, itself needs the PoE+++ potentially. Hook up a couple PoE++ devices to it and you will need the PoE+++ in to power the switch and all the devices, otherwise you won't have enough.

And very much agree the +'s are getting silly PoE3/PoE4 or whatever would be nice.
 
xentr_thread_starter
Soooo...... sanity check here.....

I've got a 3G plan with bell but typically only use 2.1G because of overhead on the 2.5G nics of the CGM..... What would happen if I plugged both the 10G port from my router into the primary WAN (of the CGM), and then one of the 1G ports into the secondary WAN and aggregated them? Would that effectively give me close to my 3G on the gateway and thus come close to maxing out 2.5G on the remaining lan ports of the CGM?

Would it create a loopback issue on the router like you get (or at least used to get) if you accidentally plugged two ends of the same cable into the same switch?
 
xentr_thread_starter
Hrmmmm....... looks like it wouldn't be useful even if it would work. First source I found WRT link aggregation states that the best you'd get out of it would be 2X the slowest link speed so it'd be limited to 2G even if it would work.
 
xentr_thread_starter
Question for the net gurus out there......

I'm trying to configure a docker app in unraid that uses a VPN paired with wireguard and I'm having issues with connections, but now I've noticed that the CGMax appears to have a wireguard server built in with no way to turn it off?

Screenshot 2025-03-31 193643.webp

Anybody know if this might be blocking the inbound ports from being passed, or am I just tilting at windmills?
 
Question for the net gurus out there......

I'm trying to configure a docker app in unraid that uses a VPN paired with wireguard and I'm having issues with connections, but now I've noticed that the CGMax appears to have a wireguard server built in with no way to turn it off?

View attachment 43435

Anybody know if this might be blocking the inbound ports from being passed, or am I just tilting at windmills?
I believe you're seeing this right when you click on the "VPN Server" tab right? It's taking you to the "Create New" screen as there's nothing else to show.

I have one setup, so mine looks like this:

1743464575159.webp

Also if you go to the Insights section, you'd see it there too if running:

1743464649018.webp
 
xentr_thread_starter
I believe you're seeing this right when you click on the "VPN Server" tab right? It's taking you to the "Create New" screen as there's nothing else to show.

I have one setup, so mine looks like this:

View attachment 43436

Also if you go to the Insights section, you'd see it there too if running:

View attachment 43437

Yeah, that looks right. I wasn't seeing the "ADD" option at the bottom of my screen which would be what made use of the settings in the screen I posted. Guess I'll have to look elsewhere for what's causing my issues.

1743465411256.webp
 
Probably some wonkiness with Docker networking would be my guess, I'm not an expert at all in that. Could be that unRAID is the one using the port that the container is trying to use?
 
Back
Top