besides 5 vs 6 i thought the NanoHD was still specced higher than the 6 lite.
Downgrading from 4x4 to 2x2 etc.
(I was contemplating replacing the NanoHD with the 6 lite in the bedroom hallway but it doesn't seem like a move forward)
I stand to be corrected, but I believe the higher spec on the Nano is more about being able to handle more simultaneous clients (up to 200) than about quality of connection. I've got less than 50 wifi devices split between two APs so I'll never hit than.
I'm hoping that I'll see higher throughput to my laptop with an ax AP than I am currently seeing with the ac NanoHD.