Temperature & Acoustical Testing / Power Consumption
For all temperature testing, the cards were placed on an open test bench with a single 120mm 1200RPM fan placed ~8” away from the heatsink. The ambient temperature was kept at a constant 22°C (+/- 0.5°C). If the ambient temperatures rose above 23°C at any time throughout the test, all benchmarking was stopped. For this test we use the 3DMark Batch Size test at it highest triangle count with 4xAA and 16xAF enabled and looped it for one hour to determine the peak load temperature as measured by GPU-Z.
For Idle tests, we let the system idle at the Windows 7 desktop for 15 minutes and recorded the peak temperature.
Luckily for NVIDIA, some of the more sensational theories about out of control GPU temperatures on a dual Fermi card have finally been put to rest. Through the use of a high-end cooling design equipped with a pair of vapor chamber coolers, the GTX 590’s temperatures are kept well in check. Considering the effect high temperatures have on the power consumption of transistors, keeping the cores under the 80°C mark is one of the main reasons why NVIDIA lists this card as having a TDP of “only” 365W.
The only real concern we have is the direction of the GTX 590’s exhaust being in the direct opposite of a normal case’s airflow pattern. As such, we’re going to recommend that in-chassis air movement be a priority when using one or more of these cards.
Yes, we have finally added decibel testing to our repertoire and this section will expand in future reviews. What you see below are the baseline idle dB(A) results attained for a relatively quiet open-case system (specs are in the Methodology section) sans GPU along with the attained results for each individual card in idle and load scenarios. The meter we use has been calibrated and is placed at seated ear-level exactly 12” away from the GPU’s fan. For the load scenarios, a loop of Unigine Heave 2.5 is used in order to generate a constant load on the GPU(s) over the course of 20 minutes. For Idle results, the average was taken over the course of 5 minutes.
The Average results you see are based on a log taken once every 30 seconds throughout the Load and Idle tests.
Due to the short timeframe we had with the decibel meter the number of cards we were able to test was limited at best. Nonetheless, we can see that NVIDIA’s approach of a compact yet potent cooling design with a centrally mounted 80mm fan is definitely paying dividends. The GTX 590 is downright silent for a dual GPU card and even gives the normally quiet GTX 580 a good run for its acoustical money. Even the HD 6970 – AMD’s flagship single GPU card – is louder.
One of the major critiques we had with the HD 6990 was the high pitched squeal it exhibited when stressed in certain applications. Once that noise was paired up with the cooling fan’s drone, AMD’s Antilles became thoroughly unpleasant to use and really made its presence felt. The GTX 590 on the other hand just feels more refined since its fan doesn’t spin past the 1700 RPM mark and VRM whine is next to nonexistent.
For this test we hooked up our power supply to a UPM power meter that will log the power consumption of the whole system twice every second. In order to stress the GPU as much as possible we once again use the Batch Render test in 3DMark06 and let it run for 30 minutes to determine the peak power consumption while letting the card sit at a stable Windows desktop for 30 minutes to determine the peak idle power consumption. We have also included several other tests as well.
Please note that after extensive testing, we have found that simply plugging in a power meter to a wall outlet or UPS will NOT give you accurate power consumption numbers due to slight changes in the input voltage. Thus we use a Tripp-Lite 1800W line conditioner between the 120V outlet and the power meter.
Talking about power consumption in the realm of dual GPU cards is almost pointless since anyone buying a GTX 590 or HD 6990 likely doesn’t give a damn about their monthly power bill. With that being said, we were pleasantly surprised with the numbers achieved by this card considering all the doom and gloom many critics were predicting.
Underclocking and lowering the voltage on the cores and memory contributed in a big way to higher efficiency, especially when the power consumption of a GTX 570 SLI or GTX 580 SLI solution is taken into account.
Our sample displayed lower power consumption than the HD 6990 as well but due to sample to sample variance, this may not be the case with all GTX 590 cards. Nonetheless, this is still an accomplishment worthy of note.
We have been told by NVIDIA that the GTX 590 has been designed in such a way that it doesn’t draw any more than 75W from the PCI-E slot. Any additional power that’s needed is pumped through the two 8-pin connectors. In practice, this means auxiliary power connectors on the motherboard aren’t needed but we’d still recommend you buy a board which allows for additional PCI-E slot power if you plan on running two of these cards.
Temperature Analysis
For all temperature testing, the cards were placed on an open test bench with a single 120mm 1200RPM fan placed ~8” away from the heatsink. The ambient temperature was kept at a constant 22°C (+/- 0.5°C). If the ambient temperatures rose above 23°C at any time throughout the test, all benchmarking was stopped. For this test we use the 3DMark Batch Size test at it highest triangle count with 4xAA and 16xAF enabled and looped it for one hour to determine the peak load temperature as measured by GPU-Z.
For Idle tests, we let the system idle at the Windows 7 desktop for 15 minutes and recorded the peak temperature.
Luckily for NVIDIA, some of the more sensational theories about out of control GPU temperatures on a dual Fermi card have finally been put to rest. Through the use of a high-end cooling design equipped with a pair of vapor chamber coolers, the GTX 590’s temperatures are kept well in check. Considering the effect high temperatures have on the power consumption of transistors, keeping the cores under the 80°C mark is one of the main reasons why NVIDIA lists this card as having a TDP of “only” 365W.
The only real concern we have is the direction of the GTX 590’s exhaust being in the direct opposite of a normal case’s airflow pattern. As such, we’re going to recommend that in-chassis air movement be a priority when using one or more of these cards.
Acoustical Testing
Yes, we have finally added decibel testing to our repertoire and this section will expand in future reviews. What you see below are the baseline idle dB(A) results attained for a relatively quiet open-case system (specs are in the Methodology section) sans GPU along with the attained results for each individual card in idle and load scenarios. The meter we use has been calibrated and is placed at seated ear-level exactly 12” away from the GPU’s fan. For the load scenarios, a loop of Unigine Heave 2.5 is used in order to generate a constant load on the GPU(s) over the course of 20 minutes. For Idle results, the average was taken over the course of 5 minutes.
The Average results you see are based on a log taken once every 30 seconds throughout the Load and Idle tests.
Due to the short timeframe we had with the decibel meter the number of cards we were able to test was limited at best. Nonetheless, we can see that NVIDIA’s approach of a compact yet potent cooling design with a centrally mounted 80mm fan is definitely paying dividends. The GTX 590 is downright silent for a dual GPU card and even gives the normally quiet GTX 580 a good run for its acoustical money. Even the HD 6970 – AMD’s flagship single GPU card – is louder.
One of the major critiques we had with the HD 6990 was the high pitched squeal it exhibited when stressed in certain applications. Once that noise was paired up with the cooling fan’s drone, AMD’s Antilles became thoroughly unpleasant to use and really made its presence felt. The GTX 590 on the other hand just feels more refined since its fan doesn’t spin past the 1700 RPM mark and VRM whine is next to nonexistent.
System Power Consumption
For this test we hooked up our power supply to a UPM power meter that will log the power consumption of the whole system twice every second. In order to stress the GPU as much as possible we once again use the Batch Render test in 3DMark06 and let it run for 30 minutes to determine the peak power consumption while letting the card sit at a stable Windows desktop for 30 minutes to determine the peak idle power consumption. We have also included several other tests as well.
Please note that after extensive testing, we have found that simply plugging in a power meter to a wall outlet or UPS will NOT give you accurate power consumption numbers due to slight changes in the input voltage. Thus we use a Tripp-Lite 1800W line conditioner between the 120V outlet and the power meter.
Talking about power consumption in the realm of dual GPU cards is almost pointless since anyone buying a GTX 590 or HD 6990 likely doesn’t give a damn about their monthly power bill. With that being said, we were pleasantly surprised with the numbers achieved by this card considering all the doom and gloom many critics were predicting.
Underclocking and lowering the voltage on the cores and memory contributed in a big way to higher efficiency, especially when the power consumption of a GTX 570 SLI or GTX 580 SLI solution is taken into account.
Our sample displayed lower power consumption than the HD 6990 as well but due to sample to sample variance, this may not be the case with all GTX 590 cards. Nonetheless, this is still an accomplishment worthy of note.
We have been told by NVIDIA that the GTX 590 has been designed in such a way that it doesn’t draw any more than 75W from the PCI-E slot. Any additional power that’s needed is pumped through the two 8-pin connectors. In practice, this means auxiliary power connectors on the motherboard aren’t needed but we’d still recommend you buy a board which allows for additional PCI-E slot power if you plan on running two of these cards.
Last edited: