Partial and Full Drive Performance
<i>While it is important to know how a drive will perform under optimal conditions, more realistic scenarios are just as important. Knowing if a solid state drive will behave differently when partially or even nearly full than when it is empty is very important information to know. To quickly and accurately show this crucial information we have first filled the drive to 50% capacity and re-tested using both synthetic and real world tests. After the completion of this we then re-test at 75% and 90% of full capacity. </i>
Synthetic Test Results
<i>For our synthetic testing we have opted for our standard PCMark 7 test.</i>
<div align="center"><img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/WD_Blue1TB/data_pcm.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>
Real World Results
<i>For a real world application we have opted for a modified version of our standard Windows 7 Start Up test. Unlike our standard Windows 7 image this image is based on a working system that has been upgraded numerous times of the past few years and represents an even more realistic real world test.</i>
<div align="center"><img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/WD_Blue1TB/data_boot.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>
The combination of TLC NAND and a Marvell controller has never been a standout choice when it comes to full drive performance and as such these results are pretty much what we expected them to be – decent but not stellar when compared against similarly priced models like the VX500 and even XLR8 CS2211. By that same token they are nearly comparable to what Crucial's MX300 can do so that is not too shabby to say the least.
Partial and Full Drive Performance
<i>While it is important to know how a drive will perform under optimal conditions, more realistic scenarios are just as important. Knowing if a solid state drive will behave differently when partially or even nearly full than when it is empty is very important information to know. To quickly and accurately show this crucial information we have first filled the drive to 50% capacity and re-tested using both synthetic and real world tests. After the completion of this we then re-test at 75% and 90% of full capacity. </i>
Synthetic Test Results
<i>For our synthetic testing we have opted for our standard PCMark 7 test.</i>
<div align="center"><img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/WD_Blue1TB/data_pcm.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>
Real World Results
<i>For a real world application we have opted for a modified version of our standard Windows 7 Start Up test. Unlike our standard Windows 7 image this image is based on a working system that has been upgraded numerous times of the past few years and represents an even more realistic real world test.</i>
<div align="center"><img src="http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image/akg/Storage/WD_Blue1TB/data_boot.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>
The combination of TLC NAND and a Marvell controller has never been a standout choice when it comes to full drive performance and as such these results are pretty much what we expected them to be – decent but not stellar when compared against similarly priced models like the VX500 and even XLR8 CS2211. By that same token they are nearly comparable to what Crucial's MX300 can do so that is not too shabby to say the least.