System Light Dark

xentr_theme_editor

xentr_page_setup xentr_appearance xentr_sidebar

  • xentr_page_width

    xentr_toggle_page_width

    xentr_page_width_description

    xentr_color_pickers

    xentr_toggle_color_picker

    xentr_toggle_color_picker_description

    xentr_typography

    xentr_select_the_font_you_want_to_use

    xentr_node_layout

    xentr_grid_layout

    xentr_grid_layout_description

  • Style variation

    xentr_select_the_style_variation_you_want_to_use
    System Light Dark

  • xentr_sidebar

    xentr_toggles_sidebar

    xentr_sidebar_description

    xentr_sticky_sidebar

    xentr_sticky_sidebar_description
    xentr_sidebar_position
    Left
    Right
  • Please do not post any links until you have 3 posts as they will automatically be rejected to prevent SPAM. Many words are also blocked due to being used in SPAM Messages. Thanks!

GeForce Titan

Assuming that this even exists....I doubt it will cost more than a 690. That would just be stupid. My guess it will be a '685' and cost right between a 680 and 690.
 
Thats assuming it's slower than a 690... All we can do is wait and see but it's fun to speculate. :P

Also remember where that site is... we get shafted in Europe on GPU prices.. a 690 is $1100 - $1350 on that site and this is after nearly a year of wide-spread availability
(there were no shortages in Europe like there was over there for the first few months)

1300 for there will probably translate to $800 RRP but with many places charging a premium simply for having stock.
 
For that price I'd hope it comes with a whole CASE of lube. :P

I doubt it will be faster than a 690 as that is basically 2x 680s. Thats a hell of a lot of power for one chip in the same gen to beat. But yeah speculation is always fun. My S.W.A.G. is its right in between a 680 and 690 on performance....maybe a bit better on power per watt basis. :)
 
xentr_thread_starter
If it'll be 80-90% of the 690 at 750-800$, I'd buy it with a heartbeat.
 
Try to remember that if anything, you'll likely pay a premium since we're taking single vs dual GPU cards. Hence, greater potential to avoid the performance loss normally associated with dual GPU cards.

To me, that's worth a price equal to a GTX 690 even if this mythical "Titan" ends up getting 80% of a GTX 690's performance.
 
xentr_thread_starter
But the Kepler architecture (as well as the 680/690) was introduced almost a year ago... the performance per $ ratio should improve over time... I will NOT pay more money for less performance (or the same money for less performance) relatively to last year's offerings.
 
GT7R said:
But the Kepler architecture (as well as the 680/690) was introduced almost a year ago... the performance per $ ratio should improve over time... I will NOT pay more money for less performance (or the same money for less performance) relatively to last year's offerings.
Click to expand...

You are looking at charts only which rarely tell the full story. When you pay $1000 for a GPU, the last thing you want is to get 50% of its potential in new games due to missing or faulty multi card profiles. A single GPU card with almost as much performance would (IMO) arguably be of better value since it will suffer from none of those issues.

Under no circumstance should the perf / $ ratio improve either. Only when new cards are on the VERY near horizon will discounts be started. That's a hallmark of a healthy market. If midlife cards were being discounted, it would be something to worry about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

xentr_legal_notice_title

xentr_legal_notice_description

Back
Top