discussion HWC Folding@Home Project PPD Database

[lowfat]

That is impressive for a single CPU. Shame it won't be able to do bigadv much longer.

 

[Shadowmeph]

this is my main PC which is a 1100t be clocked at 3.8 using 5 cores for folding

Project ID: 7506
Core: GRO-A3
Credit: 706
Frames: 100

Name: 1100T be
Path: \\192.168.1.115\fah\
Number of Frames Observed: 300

Min. Time / Frame : 00:03:52 - 20,946.7 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:04:47 - 15,223.9 PPD


Finally after messing around with this for 8+ hours then realizing why I wasn't about to connect ( silly me lol) I have my Linux box up and running but I really don't think that it is picking up and Bigadv wus
Opteron single 6128

Project ID: 7142
Core: GRO-A3
Credit: 585
Frames: 100

Name: single Opt 6128
Path: \\SERVFOLDER\fah\
Number of Frames Observed: 10

Min. Time / Frame : 00:04:03 - 14,097.7 PPD
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:04:12 - 13,349.3 PPD
Cur. Time / Frame : 00:04:05 - 13,925.4 PPD
R3F. Time / Frame : 00:04:04 - 14,011.1 PPD
All Time / Frame : 00:04:12 - 13,349.3 PPD
Eff. Time / Frame : -00:43:43 - -192.7 PPD

 

[MARSTG]

it might not be picking at all bigadv due to the shortage, I had the same issue yestarday i set up my info on a laptop with a mobile CPU Intel i7-2630QM with 4c/8t configuration (a huge Toshiba Qosmio 17") and it picked up a SMP unit not bigadv. SMP wise that cpu was doing around 8k PPD. GPU, a mobile GTX560 was doing around 7200PPD, took a 6804

 

[G777]

I haven't had a bigadv unit on my 2700k for a month or so, there seems to be a shortage of 6900 & 6901 units.

 

[3.0charlie]

Still plenty bigadv WUs under Linux folding. Now, to close the Bulldozer experiment... using a single 6272 in 'Deux':

Project ID: 6903
Core: GRO-A5
Credit: 22706
Frames: 100

Name: Linux 2p
Path: \\FOLDING-LINUX\fah\
Number of Frames Observed: 300
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:51:52 - 70,977.4 PPD


--------------

Project ID: 6904
Core: GRO-A5
Credit: 31541
Frames: 100

Name: Linux 2p
Path: \\FOLDING-LINUX\fah\
Number of Frames Observed: 300
Avg. Time / Frame : 01:03:02 - 86,736.3 PPD

Conclusion? Don't go for BD. Yet.

 

[Alpine]

maybe with 2 cpus thats should be better.

 

[Silent_Avenger]

This is my little dedicated folder which cost me a whole $55 to put together.


Project:7706
Credit : 1609.69
PPD : 217 avg.
CPU : Pentium D 820
Clocks : 2.8GHz stock @ 51C load 24C ambient
Core : GRO-A4
Notes : packets = big



Project:5768
Credit : 353
PPD : 6583 avg.
GPU : Zotac GTS 250 Eco Edition
Clocks : 750 core, 1900 shader, 1100 memory, stock volts @ 70C load 24C ambient
Core : GROGPU2
Notes: packets = big


Total ppd for the system (oddly enough) adds up to 6800ppd avg. Total system power draw is 196W at the wall +-4W due to fluctuation. The total system would probably be more efficient if I didn't run a smp on the cpu but for now I'll keep it running smp until I can upgrade to at least a 560Ti.

 

[MARSTG]

the gts 250 outputs around 6200PPD so is normal. GPU PPD production is not hurt by the CPU folding, is the other way around.

 

[3.0charlie]

Quad 6174s

Project ID: 6903
Core: GRO-A5
Credit: 22706
Frames: 100

Name: Linux 4p
Path: \\FOLDING4P-LINUX\fah\
Number of Frames Observed: 123
Avg. Time / Frame : 00:14:23 - 486,029.9 PPD

Credit: 484263

 

[lowfat]

That is ridiculous. I was thinking about doing an SR-X this spring. Mostly because I already have an HTPX case. But 486,000 PPD on a single rig is just insane. Would likely not be any more expensive than an SR-X rig. But then I'd need to figure out a case situation.