discussion wPrime 2.0 32M/1024M Benchmark Competition

[CMetaphor]

Teehee!! Behemoths 16 cores of 18-month old architecture still hold the 1024m crown! /Taunt h34r:

Cmon people! lets push HwC higher up on the Hwbot.org charts!

Our current hwbot rankings:
Rank

Worldwide Rank: #95 of 809 Country Rank: #3 of 6 in Canada

 

[MpG]

Heh, I'm working on it. I'm below 200sec now, but haven't got the water up and running yet.

 

[CMetaphor]

Heh, I'm working on it. I'm below 200sec now, but haven't got the water up and running yet.

Bring it! Not only is it a fun and friendly competition amongst HwC, but it'll help our Hwbot team scores! No downside! :thumb:

 

[CMetaphor]

I just though I'd try and push the competitive spirit a little more.

After some tweaks:
32m - 6.679 Seconds
1024m - 137.727 Seconds

Behemoth. Need I say more?

 

[Chos3n]

Where are those Istanbul CPU already? 16 Cores is SOOO 2008. Now everyone runs on 24 Cores system :haha:

 

[MpG]

Urgh, seriously, one delay after another with my ing water plans. So here's my air entry. It's actually part of my stability testing, but the necessary stuff is all there. A little blurry from the resizing, but I think it legible.

32M best: 6.051sec
1024M best: 184.517sec

 

[CMetaphor]

Updated! :thumb:

Some nice 32m numbers there!

 

[CanadaRox]

That version is also 1.55. I don't know how they compare exactly but I do know a few versions run much faster than others. I'm pretty sure they designed 2.00 to be about the same speed as 1.55 for modern hardware.

 

[MpG]

They're pretty close, but I've been finding version 2.00 to be consistently slightly faster on 32M, and about a whole 2 seconds faster on 1024M.

 

[CMetaphor]

I accepted the 1.55 result just cause im getting so few results... :sad: disappointing.