There's been nothing in this thread that comes close to crossing any lines.
Pretty much what I thought....
If I hadn't edited the title and link for clarity, this might have been the case as it was a little misleading by not mentioning that it was an AI spouting that nonsense.
Well, that's a matter of opinion, because if you noticed, at the end of my title, I included an exclamation point and a question mark, because I found it rather incredulous, that in spite of AI already having been shown to be somewhat stupid in some of the results it spits out, that it was stupid enough, in this case, to come up with those types of results. That, and if the title tweaked anybody's sensibilities, all they'd have to do, is click the link and see what prompted my questioning of those results. It is, of course, as
@FreeKnight pointed out, AI simply combing the internet to come up with all the garbage in the title, but it still kinda blew me away that I was reading that.
I'm glad to see that we can handle difficult topics with polite discussion. This hasn't always been the case. Carry on, nothing to see here.
So then, based on what's been said here, it's NOT against any rules to mention DeSantis as it relates to
@FreeKnight 's little jab, and it's only against the rules if said jab causes a thread to devolve into 'forum anarchy'?
The amount of dust on our banhammers is both encouraging and sad.
Our forum has definately evolved over the years and with the Mods has been kept in a state that should be a template for other sites I see out there in the world.
Yeah, encouraging because other places can be close to anarchy, whereas here it isn't, but then how much of that is nothing more than the number of active members around here..... yeah, kinda sad.