Now that I've had time to browse multiple benchmarks to see the different ideas each review came up with, I would like to pick a bone with you:
I would say this is an overstatement and a bit opinionated of a statement as (with any game) we find some games just favour the 7970 due to drivers or optimizations. It's mostly accurate to say the 670 trades performance blows with the 7970 but saying it runs dead even is something I chose to say otherwise. If you wish to keep your statement thus, I'm smart enough to process the information on my own and make my own decision, but it just doesn't sit well with me to read it thus.
My personal opinion is that "it will be few and far between the scenarios where gamer will want to chose Tahiti over the 670."
As always, I always suggest to people to use multiple credible review sites to process the information as no site has the perfect benchmarking process for every game :thumb:
Thanks for sticking to the points at hand.
You do bring up a good argument but I was referring to the chart within the conclusion which showed average performance across games. Again, and as I said before, I am willing to concede that I should have made that point more obvious.
But this brings me to another point: people should go through the entire review and not base their opinion upon the conclusion, which is typically generalized because it is impossible to pick apart performance numbers in every game within the allotted space.